Jump to content

Chickenman

Members
  • Posts

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Chickenman's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

0

Reputation

  1. Quick question. For sensor calibrations, are they saved in the actual .pclr file or in another location? I normally tune Mega Squirt Tuner Studio saves them in a separate project folder and it can be a PITA when creating new Tunes off line. Learning about Haltceh and Link more and more. So far I'm really liking Link products.
  2. Progress update. Above VE Table came in quite Rich. Not sure why but I was expecting it off the get go. Quickly reduced VE Table by 15% overall and having Gabriel test again. We'll get there. One possibility is that Independent tests of these injectors show they flow more than they are rated at. Fast 33 lb LS2 injectors. Fast isn't apparently much help with specs.
  3. Yep... the above is exactly what I did. As soon as I corrected the Fuel Density the VE Table came out nicely. This appears to be much more realistic. Used to working on a different ECU make , that calculates Fuel Density in Background.... so incorrect Fuel Density value did not jump out at me. Lesson learned. Attached is Baseline VE Table. Note I'. m using MAP on X axis instead of MGP. Also scaled for Normally aspirated engine. Re-worked Tune attached with VE calculation for 300 cc injectors. ( 33 lbs / 346 cc at 58 psi. 28.5 lbs / 299cc at 43.5 psi ). DT values from independent testing. https://ls1tech.com/forums/fueling-injection/1741597-specific-data-fast-36-lb-injectors-anyone.html Note; Latency quite low on these injectors, which is why I'm thinking that VE Values seem to be higher than similar size injectors with Latency around 0.750ms at 13v. These are " apparently " 0.438ms at 13v. CM Tune 6 correct Fuel Density.pclr
  4. Ah... that sort of answers things . Are all the other default Link Maps set up for Traditional or Modelling? They all seem to have the correct Fuel Density settings. Seems a bit weird that this is the only one with the Fuel Density factor out by a country mile. Gabriel has different injectors , so went with Modelling. Assumed supplied Fuel Density values would be correct. Didn't notice error right off the Bat, as it's normally a constant. Engine is Normally Aspirated as well. Only used supplied Toyota Supra Turbo Tune to get some default ECU values for start-up. All Tables were Custom altered for NA engine. I'll work around it, by using Default Storm Map. That seems to have the correct Fuel Density values as well. This time I'll triple check. I'll just have to re-work whole tune....
  5. Also noted same error in Baseline Map of PC Link Version 5.65.3338. Toyota Supra IV G4+ Xtreme Plugin.pclr
  6. Fuel Density is wrong by a factor of Ten because that is what is supplied in Baseline Tune for Toyota Supra 2JZ with PC Link. Only file that seems to have this error. Attached is Baseline Tune that comes with PC LINK ( Version 5.6.6.3601) . Open it and look at Modeled Fuel. Fuel Density value is set at 0.0775 g/cc from Link Tune. Didn't notice it when we loaded Tune. Assumed Baseline Tune would have correct info. Threw a bunch of calculations out of whack. Toyota Supra IV G4+ Xtreme Plugin.pclr
×
×
  • Create New...