Jump to content

Brad Burnett

Dealer
  • Posts

    792
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    38

Posts posted by Brad Burnett

  1. yes it will work as you described.

    The ecu will be capable of utilizing the stock crank/cam reluctor wheels pending the settings are configured accordingly.

     

     

  2. You will be fine with the sensor in that location and it is better that the sensor is closest to vertical as possible to minimize condensation build up in the sensor on start up which can damage the heating element. 

    There will not be much of a noticeable lag with the sensor that far from turbo.  Sensor on my down pipe is roughly the same distance from turbo. 

    Closer to the turbo will reduce sensor life via extra heat. 

  3. On 2/28/2022 at 8:53 AM, barge said:

    I was thinking along those lines... once I get the aftermarket crank damper on. Unfortunate that the stock engine has no capability to verify timing while running at all.

    I hate that.  Many LSx engines are the same way.  Then you get the engines that have the timing marks on the flywheel in the bellhousing. 

    And with my hatred of timing lights, the engines that only have a TDC marks, make for utilization of "dialback" timing lights which require a extra electronics in the timing light.  My preference is the cheapest timing light possible.

  4. Im curious if moving the sensor to the fuel rail will show a different value.  Unless your ethanol content sensor has a high volume bypass adapter, I would put it on the return side installed in a manor that fuel will rest in it even in the event of low flow.  The content sensors have a small internal diameter and can be flow restrictive.

  5. 14 minutes ago, Adamw said:

    Sorry I missed this post last week.  You have attached the wrong file for the pdm, it should have a .zconfig extension.  To get this file go to the config page in RS3, put a check in the check box beside your config then hit the export button.  

    The Greyhill keypad I suspect will be a bit difficult, I dont see any predefined support for it in the current RS3.  Custom CAN to support it will be quite tricky if you want all the LED logic and various options for the count up/down switch states etc. I would contact AIM in case they have some development software or support already underway.

    Worst case - Greyhill keypad support will be available directly in the G4X firmware in the future, a while off yet but is being worked on. You could then do all the keypad logic and LED's etc in the ecu and send it to the pdm.   

    sorry to hijack here Adam, but are you guys working on the Blink keypads in similar fashion?

  6. as @Adamw stated its more than capable of controlling the engine. 

    What components do you already have in hand?

    I have done a few MK4 supras with vvti motors, but i typically use the altezza plug in unit with the factory vvti harness,  and just repin the stock vvti harness connectors to suit the altezza ecu pinout.

  7. On 11/29/2021 at 6:23 PM, Adamw said:

    If you attach your ECU and PDM config I will set up some basics as examples to work from.  There is not normally much needed, typically Fan & fuel pump requests, maybe E-throttle relay and starter control if you want that and then one or two processed button statuses from the PDM/keypad.

    Adam does the E throttle relay output from ecu have to be dedicated Aux out from ecu to pdm, or can it be configured via a CAN request?

×
×
  • Create New...