Jump to content

dmg210

Members
  • Posts

    11
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by dmg210

  1. dmg210

    G4+ Thunder OBD-II

    Hi guys, I've been doing a lot of track days recently and thought it would be great to capture some of the action on video. I have a Garmin Virb camera which supports datalogging via an OBD stream and I'd love to get it hooked up to the Link ECU. At the moment, I have the Android headunit connected via OBD which i use for temperature / pressure monitoring on track. I even have a couple of alarms setup in Torque Pro which act as an early warning for the some of the failsafe features i have configured in the Link. Would it be possible to configure the ECU to output the OBD Stream on both CAN 1 and CAN 2? Cheers @Scott@Adamw
  2. Problem 1: When testing under boost the fuel pressure seems to drop off... I thought at first maybe the fuel pump wasn't large enough so i switched from the Walbro 255lph to the Deatsch 320lph but it hasn't made a difference. I was expecting the larger pump to increase base pressure even further but that wasn't the case, it's still around 65psi with the pump at 100% duty cycle. To be honest I haven't seen this done before and i'm unsure if this is going to work... I'm just posting for ideas or advice Problem 2: I think I possibly have a leak on the fuel pressure regular hose as it sounds like I've installed a jet wash in the fuel tank. I wish i could see inside the tank whilst it's running... It could just be fuel shooting out the tiny hole in the return line that i can hear. I'm just worried it's leaking from the FPR hose clamp and spraying fuel into the electrical connections. To be honest i'm a bit stuck and I can't seem to find an example online of anyone else that has done this. Questions: - What are the downsides of running 43psi base FP with 30psi boost? Can this be done safely? I'm not seeing any drop in fuel pressure. - Could the stock FPR be completely removed? - From a safely aspect is there anything i've overlooked?
  3. Hi guys, I've come up with this wild idea of creating a rising rate fuel system using the Siemens PWM Fuel Pump Controller. The part number: 7W83-9D372-AA (Jaguar XJR V8 - 2018 model) At the moment the car has a returnless fuel system with an in-tank FPR fixed at 43.5psi. The car was originally NA although i did a turbo conversion about 10 years ago. To take things to the next level, what I'm planning to do is install a larger fuel pump to overwhelm the stock FPR and then PWM control the pump. This way I can maintain stock fuel pressure during idle / cruise, quieten down the pump and reduce heat etc. During boost I can increase pressure (1:1) by speeding up the pump (in theory anyway). My old pump was around 160 Lph, the new pump I’m testing with is a 340 Lph from Deatschwerks. The new pump has the PRV set at 100psi. With a raising rate FPR this should allow for around 50psi of boost (way more than what my little TD05-20g can handle)... One good thing about these aftermarket pumps they are rated for between 6v and 18v which seems a perfect match for the fuel pump controller I'm testing. I need to do a little more research and check if the 340lph is within spec in terms of max current draw etc. I also need to review the wiring specs (especially on the PWM side). From initial testing: Voltage at pump (engine running - FP Speed - Open Loop) voltage fuel pressure duty cycle 4.8v 45psi 40% (unhappy) 6.1v 47psi 50% (sounds good, very quiet) 7.4v 48psi 60% 8.6v 50psi 70% 9.7v 52psi 80% 10.7v 68psi 90% 11.6v 65psi 100% (loud AF) Note: The duty cycle is backwards in the screenshot. 70% = low speed (6v at pump), 50% = full blast (12v at pump). The stock FPR which sits inside the fuel pump housing. It seems to have a tiny little hole in the return line. Testing base fuel pressure with the PWM output rigged up to the AP:
  4. Hi, I have taken a trigger scope of the car, pretty sure the hyundai has hall type sensors. Can anyone tell from the trigger scope if i should use the rising or falling edge signals from the crank / cam sensors? Thanks Trigger Scope Log.llg
  5. dmg210

    G4+ Thunder OBD-II

    Just looking at a screenshot from one of your previous posts. Should the iso standard be 15765-4 not 15764-4?
  6. dmg210

    G4+ Thunder OBD-II

    Excellent, that's great news. Cheers Scott.
  7. dmg210

    G4+ Thunder OBD-II

    Would it be possible to add additional parameters with a firmware update? It would be great to be able to create a set of custom PIDs. Do you know if the EGT parameter will ever be added to the obd stream?
  8. dmg210

    G4+ Thunder OBD-II

    Thanks for checking, much appreciated. In that case I might keep the plx egt modules and use the analogue egt outputs for data logging on the ecu.
  9. dmg210

    G4+ Thunder OBD-II

    Can anyone confirm if the EGT parameter is available via the can bus obd? Thanks in advance, Dan
  10. dmg210

    G4+ Thunder OBD-II

    Oh ok great. At the moment I have PLX EGT gauges which I'm using with a imfd to USB cable which is connected to my Android unit. I would like to wire the egt probes directly to the thunder ecu thermocouple inputs so I can datalog then use the obd output for the display. This would make for a much cleaner install.
  11. dmg210

    G4+ Thunder OBD-II

    Hi, Please can you advise on the OBD-II PIDs available on the thunder ecu? I would like to use my Android headunit to display AFR, EGT, ECT, IAT and STFT if possible? It would be great if you could programme your own PIDs :-) Cheers, Dan
×
×
  • Create New...