mapper Posted October 1, 2014 Report Share Posted October 1, 2014 (edited) HiI use many ignition correction tables (IAT,coolant, traction control, speed correction) etc. In the worst case all the corrections can become active together, consequently the overall ignition timing can go much to retarded.So i thought about a minimum timing table that is always active, except while launching or ALS is active. This way we can prevent the engine from overheating, stalling or mechanical issues. Edited April 21, 2016 by mapper Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Posted January 29, 2015 Report Share Posted January 29, 2015 Hi Mapper, Apologies for the slow response on this. I will add this to our request list. Scott Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mapper Posted April 18, 2016 Author Report Share Posted April 18, 2016 (edited) Any update to this? just had the situation that a too retarded timing has ended up in uncontrollable boost creap and much to high EGT's . Happened because the engine was in a running condition that added up alot of safety retard on different tables.On top of that the engine is very knock limited, so we see already very high EGT's on normal operation conditions. To be exact, it's driftcar that made a standing burnout and bounced for a while on the Revlimiter. IAT, ECT and Rev Limit safety retard added up together which ended up in much too retarded timing. I don't want to reduce the IGN retard on the specific tables, because it's needed if just one condition applies (for example, just high ECT, no revlimit and good IAT's) . Functions as Traction Control, Launch control etc, can sum up the retard even more, to a level that will destroy some mechanical components. Conclusion: We need a minimum timing table, the settings should allow to choose if it's also applied while Antilag, Launch or Traction control is active. Edited April 18, 2016 by mapper Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Posted April 19, 2016 Report Share Posted April 19, 2016 Hi mapper, no news on this one yet sorry. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ducie54 Posted April 19, 2016 Report Share Posted April 19, 2016 Would it be worth while having a value option where it would reduce ignition then reduce fuel over the set valve, and vise versa for fuel cut.As example have a limit of 10 Deg ignition cut. If all the compensation of RPM, IAT, Water Temp EGT temp add up to 15 deg you would get 10 Deg ignition cut then 5% fuel cut. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.