[G4x Traditional Fuel Equation - InjectionEffectivePW]

Hello, thank you for the answer. That is understandable for me.

Kind Regards

Andre

[G4x Traditional Fuel Equation - InjectionEffectivePW]

Ok.... a litle  more explantion.

The effective injection time could be recalculated in G4:

In G4: Injection Effective PW==(Masterfuel .*(1+Master_Fuel_Trim./100) .* Fuel_Table1./100 .* MAP_./100.*((1./AFR_Target)).*((1+Crank_Enrich_./100+Post_Start_Enrich_./100+Warm_Up_Enrich./100+IAT_Fuel_Corr./100+CL_Lambda__Fuel__Corr./100)))+Prime_Fuel_+Accel_Fuel;

In G4X: Injection Effective PW==(Masterfuel .*(1+Master_Fuel_Trim./100) .* Fuel_Table1./100 .* MAP_./100.*((1./AFR_Target)).*((1+Crank_Enrich_./100+Post_Start_Enrich_./100+Warm_Up_Enrich./100+IAT_Fuel_Corr./100+Fuel_Cor_4D./100+Fuel_Cor_5D./100+CL_Lambda__Fuel__Corr./100)))+Prime_Fuel_+Accel_Fuel;

 

With the G4X model, I only get the right result if I remove the lambda controller. However, it still has to be accounted for somewhere.

 

Have you an idea?

 

Kind Regards

Andre

 

[G4x Traditional Fuel Equation - InjectionEffectivePW]

Hello, I have a question about consideration the lambda controller in the effective Injection PulseWidth in traditional Fuel Equation @G4x.

I recalculated the effective injection time (PW) using the logging data and found that the lambda controller is not taken into the equation of the effectiv injection time.

In the G4 ECU , the lambda controller was still included in the effective injection time.

Is the lambda controller included elsewhere in the G4x ECUs?

 

Kind Regards 

Andre

 

[Trigger Setup Audi 5 Cyl 20V Turbo (AAN) @ G4X]

Thanks for the feedback. 

"We dont currently have a trigger mode that can use 2 x flywheel sensors and a cam sensor." -->

The use of the CAM sensor as a third trigger signal will not come in the nearest future /release update?

[Trigger Setup Audi 5 Cyl 20V Turbo (AAN) @ G4X]

Hello, I have to ask again. I am still a beginner.I've tried different configurations. 
I think I'm still making a mistake somewhere.

I have now chosen the following configuration:

 

 

 

 

I have an Audi S6 C4 20V Turbo ('96) with AAN engine with Audi RS4 Coil conversation.

So I no longer have an ignition distributor, but individual ignition coils.

So I have a hybrid system. 

When I start the starter, the following trigger signals come up:

 

 

 

If I understand correctly, the trigger 2 has the wrong polarity. But it's OEM.

I also routed the Hall sensor signal from the exhaust camshaft to DI1.

I understand you that this signal cannot be used, correct?

If I no longer have an ignition distributor but individual ignition coils, how can I configure this so that it still works?

It has to work somehow, because the original motronic control unit can do it somehow.

I could not carry out the ignition test for each cylinder with the "distributor" ignition mode, but only with direct spark. 

Thanks for help.

 

Kind regards

Andre

[Trigger Setup Audi 5 Cyl 20V Turbo (AAN) @ G4X]

I found this in help section. This are version 2 (with cam sensor) or i am wrong?

[Trigger Setup Audi 5 Cyl 20V Turbo (AAN) @ G4X]

Thank you very much for answer. I have a conversation to Audi RS4 B5 coils (like Audi R8 Coils) and i would  like change ignition mode to direct spark.

The Audi AAN Engine have three trigger sensors.

CRANK SENSOR (135) – PRIMARY TRIGGER
CRANK SENSOR (1) - CAM #1
CAM SENSOR HALL - CAM #2

I think, there are two options with Link G4x.

The first one we discuss already.

1.) I use as primary trigger the crank sensor with 135 teeth (Trigger 1) and crank sensor (1x teeth) as the second trigger. Ignition Mode distributor. 

2.) I use as primary trigger the crank sensor with 135 teeth (Trigger 1) and cam sensor (1x teeth, Hall Sensor) as the second trigger. Ignition Mode direct spark. 

Like this:

 

 

Is that right?

Kind regards

Andre

[Trigger Setup Audi 5 Cyl 20V Turbo (AAN) @ G4X]

Hello,

i have an Audi S6 C4 20V 5Cyl Turbo  and i would like to install a Link G4X Xtreme.

Unfortunately, I saw that the G4X does not have a trigger mode like Aud 135th. That  existed in the G4+. 

I have now made the following settings. Is that right?

 

Kind Regards

Andre

[Fury or thunder X]

Thanks for answer. 

[Fury or thunder X]

There is any timeline for thunderx?

Kind Regards

[Fury or thunder X]

Hello,

any idea when the thunder x is coming? 

Kind regards

Andre

[Compatibility of G4X ECUs and RealDash]

Hello,

would the Real Dash App work with Link G4X ECU's?

The RealDash website says that it is not possible. (only with G4+)

Is there another way to display G4X readings via an app or tablet?

Kind Regards

Andre

[Fury or thunder X]

Can you roughly estimate whether the ThunderX will come this summer or this year?

 

Kind Regards

 

Andre

[Fuel Equation]

Hello,

 

thank you very much. Now it looks plausible :)

[Fuel Equation]

Hello guys,

i would like to understand the calculation of the injection time.. In my opinion, it should be relatively simple to understand.

If i have a warm engine (no cold start enrichment etc), and constant difference between fuel pressure and intake manifold pressure, the Injection_Effectiv_PW should be calculate so:

Injection_Effectiv_PW_calc=constant_conversion_factor x Master_Fuel x Fuel_Table1 x (1+Lambda__Fuel__Corr/100) x (1+Accel_Fuel/100) x (14.7/AFR_Target) x (1+IAT_Fuel_Corr/100) 

If i plot Injection_Effectiv_PW (measure)  over Injection_Effectiv_PW_calc, i haven't a straight line. I don't understand, what i do wrong? Is there another corrections for the injectors?

 

Thanks for help.

 

Best regards

Andre