intercepter
-
Posts
7 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Gallery
Blogs
Posts posted by intercepter
-
-
The ECU is set to modelled multifuel and I have methanol afr and density already specified. I have attached a screen short of the my flex fuel setting. I have also included my layout it might make easier so see all setting in individual pages and thanks again for continued help.
-
Thanks for reply. My main problem is am ruing out of VE table, for now I try adding more fuel using the 4D fuel table.
-
15 hours ago, Adamw said:
It looks like your MAP sensor is reading wrong to me, in your saved map with the engine not running the BAP is 100.3kpa but the MAP is 82Kpa, these should match. The BAP is factory calibrated by us so that suggests the MAP is wrong.
I have compared the MAP and BAP with engine off with may current map sensor MAP =101 and BAP 101.5. Then I changed my map sensor the new MAP sensor reads 101 and BAP 101.4. The difference seems very small
-
Thanks Adamw. I will try a different map sensor.
-
HI thanks for the reply.
I enabled the 4D fuel table after the run as I was running out VE table but wasn't too show if that's the appropriate solution. but I haven't tried it yet wanted see if someone has better solution. will have look at the other things you pointed out
-
Hi everyone. I am having some trouble with my Subaru v2 with a eJ25. The VE numbers seem too high at around 28 psi my injector duty cycle is around 70-75% but me VE table is almost at 150.
The engine is sleeved and forged and the heads are built with GSC S3 cam's. Fuel injectors are FIC 2150cc and am using there 4bar injector data (2794cc) fuel pump and regulator aeromotive A1000 and the turbo is Precision 7285. Am running around 25% methanol on pump vpower 99 octane which has 5% ethanol.
Am relatively new to tuning but wanted try and do it my self. can someone have look and point in right direction please. I have included my map and log
Modelled Fuel Strategy Number Too High
in G4+
Posted
I will update my fuel density and injector flow rate. from what I have read the difference is 6%. not too show how accurate that is, just waiting for FIC to respond