MattR
-
Posts
30 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation Activity
-
MattR reacted to Adamw in AFR value in logging showing incorrect value
No, you want to log the parameter "Lambda 1". Just fix your cal table.
-
MattR reacted to Rossobianconero in Ignition timing question
you just need to tune your engine, any respetable tuner should do a good job on a NA build like yours. I have tune some BMW engines and if you ask me they normally run from 25-28 of advance at wot with everything tune (good fuel map). The base map is always safe so is normal that a final tune has more timing and normally less fuel aswell. If you are gonna tune the engine I would start with the base map not the one from the rally car. Tune the fuel map and then go to the dyno and tune the timing.
-
MattR reacted to Adamw in Master Fuel question
You can do either, often easier to change it while it is running - then you can just bump it up or down until it runs best.
-
MattR reacted to Adamw in Master Fuel question
I would calculate it like this:
If your measured lambda was 0.61(9:1AFR). Lets say your target was typical NA target of 0.87. So 0.61/0.87 = 0.70 (i.e need to remove 30%).
New master fuel = 20 x 0.70 = 14ms.
-
MattR reacted to Adamw in TPS vs. MAP fuel mapping
If this is not an ITB engine and has a reasonably stable manifold vacuum then you will get a better tune switching your fuel table axis over to MAP or MGP. Note the existing fuel table numbers wont be much good to you after that as it will take a completely different shape.