Jump to content

MattR

Members
  • Posts

    30
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    MattR reacted to Adamw in AFR value in logging showing incorrect value   
    No, you want to log the parameter "Lambda 1".  Just fix your cal table.
     
  2. Like
    MattR reacted to Rossobianconero in Ignition timing question   
    you just need to tune your engine, any respetable tuner should do a good job on a NA build like yours. I have tune some BMW engines and if you ask me they normally run from 25-28 of advance at wot with everything tune (good fuel map). The base map is always safe so is normal that a final tune has more timing and normally less fuel aswell. If you are gonna tune the engine I would start with the base map not the one from the rally car. Tune the fuel map and then go to the dyno and tune the timing.
  3. Like
    MattR reacted to Adamw in Master Fuel question   
    You can do either, often easier to change it while it is running - then you can just bump it up or down until it runs best.
  4. Like
    MattR reacted to Adamw in Master Fuel question   
    I would calculate it like this:
    If your measured lambda was 0.61(9:1AFR).  Lets say your target was typical NA target of 0.87.  So 0.61/0.87 = 0.70 (i.e need to remove 30%).
    New master fuel = 20 x 0.70 = 14ms.
  5. Like
    MattR reacted to Adamw in TPS vs. MAP fuel mapping   
    If this is not an ITB engine and has a reasonably stable manifold vacuum then you will get a better tune switching your fuel table axis over to MAP or MGP.  Note the existing fuel table numbers wont be much good to you after that as it will take a completely different shape.
×
×
  • Create New...