Jump to content

Usav8or

Members
  • Content Count

    29
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Usav8or

  • Rank
    Member

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I've been away for a while waiting on new injectors since one of the others was stuck open and domping fuel int the #5 cylinder. Take a look and tell me what you think. https://www.dropbox.com/s/ptbiv1xb1avuxvr/426trigger.jpg?dl=0 https://www.dropbox.com/s/32sf7rqyb723evl/Trigger Scope Log 2019-04-26 9%3B44%3B47 pm.llg?dl=0 https://www.dropbox.com/s/wy35qnddopxik1a/Log 2019-04-26 10%3B02%3B02 pm.llg?dl=0
  2. Never mind, my mistake check valve is for the brake booster. I guess I'll be fixing that on Monday. Like I said, their instructions arent the best. Thanks
  3. I guess we'll give this a try. https://www.dropbox.com/s/flg0rs2pgsgywks/4-4-19log1.llg?dl=0 I don't know, the schematic that came with the ITB kit had it there and was otherwise short on details.. Thanks, Jeff
  4. Ok, the MAP has been replaced with the BAP and put a one-way check valve on the MAP sensor hose. The ITB's have been balanced and the idle adjusted so it runs pretty well given that we haven't done a tune on it yet. The new problem we've encountered since these adjustments is it's harder to start and has a tendency to hydrolock after shutting it down. Any idea why? I'd attach a log file, but it's too big apparently. Thanks, Jeff
  5. I may be mistaken. Looking at RHD Engineering's instructions it looks like the vacuum line runs from the #3 cylinder throttle body then T's off to the MAP sensor and the vacuum block. I'll check with my mechanic tomorrow to confirm that's how he set it up.
  6. Good question, I believe its connected to a vacuum manifold block, but I'm not sure.
  7. Could that be caused by the ITB setup that has still to be dialed in/balanced? The MAP sensor is the Link brand 2.5 bar model. Since there wasn't a Link 2.5 Bar listed in the PCLink software I selected the non-branded 2.5 BAR option. Should I use a differect option?
  8. These are not the best shots, but hopefully they'll do. The plan is to do a remote tune and then get to the dyno the next time the tuner is in town. If you have any other suggestions based on this info please let me know. Thanks again, Jeff
  9. Thanks, I was thinking it was a little close too. When running it up o temperature we discovered the new cam seal was leaking on my new engine so we'll be sure make that adjustment during reassembly. We're scheduled with the tuner at the dyno in a couple weeks so I'll post an update then. Thanks for all your help. I'm impressed with the product and support. J
  10. It's running! It's running rich, but it's running. Next is a session with the professional tuner via the internet, then in person at the dyno. I've attached a couple of pictures from the trigger scope for you review. Thank you, Jeff
  11. Yes it is, Thank you. Your help is very much appreciated.. Jeff
  12. Thank you, whatever help you can offer would be appreciated. Jeff BMW M20B29 Stroker Tune.pclr
  13. Ok, the coils work fine and the engine will run, but the base fuel table (fuel table 1) is off. I have independant throttle bodies so the load axis is set to TP (main) and it might run at a very low idle and eventually dies. If I change the load axis to MGP the engine starts and immediately revs up to the 3000 rpm rev limit protection threshold I setup. What part am I missing, I thought the program gathered all the engine parameters and gave you numbers you could start with???
  14. It does, I just don't have a picture of it. The guy who did the woring harmess and is more familliar with all of this showed me a picture/screenshot of it.
  15. I think it was early in the day and before we got the timing sorted out. We were getting a better signal on it later. Is this the correct polarity? Both are reluctor-type sensors.
×
×
  • Create New...