Top Tune NZ Posted June 18, 2011 Report Share Posted June 18, 2011 can we have lamda instead of afr ? i know this is a big job but it is very much needed with all the different fuels we are tuning Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jurgen Biggelaar Posted September 12, 2011 Report Share Posted September 12, 2011 We hear you Ross. A lot of people do ask for this, and justifyably. It will be something to come in the future maybe, but there are so many more priorities to get completed first. Jurgen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Taylor Posted March 25, 2012 Report Share Posted March 25, 2012 I'm with Dobsons here, we need to have Lambda instead of AFR, with all the Ethanol fuels we tune with and methanol drag cars logging AFR is more or less pointless. This is a big downfall and needs to be sorted. Â Call and ask any of your main dealers and im sure they will agree. Phil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevieturbo Posted June 3, 2012 Report Share Posted June 3, 2012 I dont see why AFR is pointless. The sensor or ecu doesnt know or care what fuel you are using The AFR you see is purely a maths function of Lambda x 14.7. Nothing more, nothing less. So if you want say 0.8 lambda, just tune to 11.76 AFR, They are the same regardless of fuel. Ignore the AFR name if it makes it easier, as it means little. I find it annoying that some ecu's only allow you to display lambda. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.