Jump to content

mapper

Members
  • Posts

    367
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    32

Posts posted by mapper

  1. Idealy you can rename them direct in the log file manager and save then all. 

    But for beginnig save all with date and time would be also okay. 

    l've regulary lost datalogs, because PClink stop working when I connect an external monitor on my laptop. In the begining I thought it's a problem of my hardware, but tried it meanwhile on different Laptops, external screens and windows 7 and 10. Same problem on both. But that's a topic for another tread. 

    Save all datalogs automaticly or an option to do it would be great too. Beside a button "save all datalogs"

  2. I had same message and success, after I disconnected the battery and tried the update again. Get sure that your battery is above 12,5V, I recommend to connect a battery charger. 

    On som cars turn off the ignition after the update isn't enough, you have to dis- and reconnect battery to reboot the ECU.

  3. Simon without knowing the code behind, should be an output or maybe an axis option that can be span with gear cut status not be very easy to to span? Isn't it?  

    With a gear cut status axis, pwm table can be spaned to define what combination of gearcut status and rpm shifts are physicaly outputed. 

  4. Okay 

    For sure GPS Antenna has to be external anyway. Idon't excatly now, what hardware upgrates are needed an what the cost are.

    But an CAN GPS looks like a good solution. Maybe it would make sense to integrate G-force too into this unit. The Logging is already very strong in PC-link, so it shouldn't need many additions beside the track map to allow detailed feedback for driver and chassi feedback. For example suspension travel is already there.

    GPS, g-sens and a few slots for different Maps and video overlay function would make Link the ultimate Racing ECU. In combination with a PDM also for the highest classes  in  motorsport! 

  5. My opinion to this topic is as follow: 

    There are alot GPS logging Dashes available. I don't want say never, but I suppose it's unlikely that Link will step into the motorsport dash market. Because they can get allready a part of it, without a own Dash. 

    If Link implements GPS Track logging with Lap timing on there ECU's, there is no reason for people to buy a expensive GPS logging Dash. The logging functionality in PC-Link is already great. With track logging, all logging could be made over the ECU and people just need a CAN Display instead and can save the logging option on the Dash. 

    Consequently customers are more willing to spent more into the ECU or in other words put the money they saved for the GPS update on Dash into the ECU. 

    So please Link, make it happen! :-)

     

  6. I did alot of thoughts around this topic a while ago and put it also in the wishlist section. 

    The problem for now is that there are some logic missing when it should allow a shift, and when not. And there is no output option to couple the output to the shift control. 

    Have a luck on this tread:

  7. The most important point  hasn't been raised yet. He reduces ignition timing by -50 deg. Thats very very retarded, which will lead to very high EGT. 

    I suggest to try 100% or 95% cut and just -5deg retard during shifting. Otherwise setup a GP limit table, where you can choose Fuel cut in the settings, and activate it over a virtual aux during shifting. Just set anything in the GP limit table to zero. 

    Maybe choising DI input from aux input as a axis could work too. Set GP limiter higher than your revlimiter when shift is off (DI off) and zero if shift is active (DI  on). Adjust fuel revlimit in GP settings to your needs. 

  8. Sure.

    have a look at the pictunre. I had configured the GP Y- Limit axis as Differential Fuel Pressure. on PC-LINK 5.5.3 Unfortunately Differenzial Fuel Pressure no more axis option on 5.5.7.3012.

    That's something i need alot. Can you please check that. 

    Thanks!

     

     

     

     

    Diff_Fuel_pressure_problem5_5_7.jpeg

  9. If we already separate the +- parameter, why not do a Table?

    Around idle, there is often more than 5% correction needed to cover all runing conditions (e.g after a hot restart, heat soaking etc.), under WOT and high RPM just a small correction should be applied to prevent lean running as we spoke about. On overrun situations there is often a lean spike which forces the system to go on to the rich limit. This correction are than applied for a small moment at idle, that scholdn't happen and could be limited with a 3d ftrim limit. (set less ftrim limt at load load and high rpm) 

×
×
  • Create New...