Jump to content

Suspect ECT readings


Thom

Recommended Posts

Hi,

While updating from firmware 4.8.9 to 4.9.3 I noticed that the calibration for the Bosch NTC ECT sensor had been corrected to Bosch's published calibration grid, but I'm still getting readings I suspect to be incorrect.

On my engine the fans are triggered by a thermoswitch managed by a separate wiring harness, independant from the Vi-PEC.

On the coolant circuit, this thermoswitch is plugged on the side of the radiator just besides the coolant inlet, about ~1m after the Bosch NTC sensor which is on the engine, besides the coolant outlet leading to the radiator.

The thermoswitch triggers the fans at a temperature of 92°C. At this point, ECT in the Vi-PEC reads 100°C.

I could understand a slight difference in temps, but losing 8°C over just 1 meter of coolant ducts/hoses that are not exposed to any flow of fresh air whatsoever sounds surreal to me. Unfortunately, I don't have a heat gun to measure the different points on the coolant line.

-> Any idea why the difference is so large?

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good morning,

As lemmy suggests, you can remove your ECT sensor, extend the wiring so that you can put the sensor in a pot or bowl of boiling water and use an external thermometer to compare the reading you get in VTS with what your external thermometer reads.

Scott

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could work out a calib for your sensor if you would have to solved it immediately.

if you have a good thermometer for reference.

Make a measure at 0,60 and 100/98 °C and interpolate the other values in the calib table.

Than you should close enough.

To have it very acurate you could make some more holds at 70 -90°C range.

No big thing but you must have the sensor connect to the ecu and at best use the same wireing for calibration.

Put both sensors in water move them and note the readings.

But do not go to fast over the points it take some time to stabilize because of the different reaction time of the sensors

1512_TN_P1040319_1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I tried this calibration today and though I feel the results are closer to what they should be I think ECT now slightly underreads - my correction may be slightly excessive.

Sutkale, care to share more details on what you are seeing? Interested to hear about other set ups.

In my particular application the problem is that the coolant temp sensor is located in a "bypass" vein where coolant flow is highest when the thermostat is closed. When the thermostat opens, the waterpump then pulls most of the coolant out from the radiator and the flow in this vein should logically be lower than during the warm up period. As a result, it is possible that coolant may always read higher in this vein than in the rest of the engine...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I tried this calibration today and though I feel the results are closer to what they should be I think ECT now slightly underreads - my correction may be slightly excessive.

Sutkale, care to share more details on what you are seeing? Interested to hear about other set ups.

In my particular application the problem is that the coolant temp sensor is located in a "bypass" vein where coolant flow is highest when the thermostat is closed. When the thermostat opens, the waterpump then pulls most of the coolant out from the radiator and the flow in this vein should logically be lower than during the warm up period. As a result, it is possible that that coolant may always read higher in this vein than in the rest of the engine. Also, this vein is quite narrow, so if coolant doesn't flow through super fast then it may be getting heat-soaked by aluminium around it...

Well, the heat gun showed 75 degrees while sensor showed 125 degrees. In reality the 75 is the real one since I have 78 degrees thermostat, very cold I know. Currently I am in the heat of making tests to my wiring harness due to another reasons but this problem is to be targeted also. However, the readings are correct while the engine is cold and this makes me think the firmware update has something to do with this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...