mack85n Posted February 10, 2017 Report Share Posted February 10, 2017 Which would be the best approach to wiring a 6 cylinder engine with individual injectors on an ECU (Link G4+ storm blue) that has 4 injector drives? Also what what is the idea behind batch injection being adjustable to have injection occur every 360 or 720 degrees of rotation. If tuning a traditional fuel map would injection durations be double for a 720 injection as opposed to 360 degree. Just looking for further explination on the tuning approach to this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adamw Posted February 10, 2017 Report Share Posted February 10, 2017 I would set it to sequential and wire for a semi-sequential operation: In real life there is usually very little noticeable difference in how an engine will run when comparing semi-sequential to multi-point group mode, but with semi-seq you may be able to achieve a slightly smoother idle and very light load operation.In 360 mode your injector has to fire twice as often so pulse widths are halved and you have twice the dead time per cycle, this becomes an issue mostly only with very large injectors but I still suggest always use 720 mode if you have capable triggering. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mack85n Posted February 10, 2017 Author Report Share Posted February 10, 2017 I would set it to sequential and wire for a semi-sequential operation: In real life there is usually very little noticeable difference in how an engine will run when comparing semi-sequential to multi-point group mode, but with semi-seq you may be able to achieve a slightly smoother idle and very light load operation.In 360 mode your injector has to fire twice as often so pulse widths are halved and you have twice the dead time per cycle, this becomes an issue mostly only with very large injectors but I still suggest always use 720 mode if you have capable triggering. thanks, i have base line specs for injection duration for the injectors I intend to run if set up as a fully sequential injection system. Would these inputs be the same for a fuel table on 720 degree injection in semi sequential ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adamw Posted February 11, 2017 Report Share Posted February 11, 2017 Yes, pulse width for a semi-seq setup will in theory be the same as a true sequential set up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CamB Posted February 12, 2017 Report Share Posted February 12, 2017 If you have this setup, how is it best to approach setting injection timing? The typical method is to tune by AFR but 1/2 the cylinders will be different?In my case, I may be looking at this on a flat 6 with two lambda sensors and ITBs, so can probably try and pick injection timing that matches (and I suspect it is slightly before valve opens on 1 / 3 / 5 which is 120 deg later on 2 /4 /6, although there is probably also an injection timing that would see both inlet valve "pairs" open if that was desirable). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adamw Posted February 13, 2017 Report Share Posted February 13, 2017 At idle and very light loads you can tune the injection timing using lambda, in this semi-seq case you would be aiming for lowest combined or averaged lambda. At higher loads it is generally tuned by torque output. With semi-seq I suspect the difference between optimized timing and not optimized will be pretty subtle (~1-2%) so you may have trouble actually noticing anything. Generally with mild overlap engines you will only see noticeable effects from injection timing below about 40% DC so I wouldnt both tuning beyond there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CamB Posted February 14, 2017 Report Share Posted February 14, 2017 Thanks - appreciate the advice.It's a high overlap 2 valve engine with ITBs so it might be sensitive. I guess I will find out... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CamB Posted March 5, 2017 Report Share Posted March 5, 2017 (edited) Sorry for digging up an old thread, but directly relevant to the above. If wired up as below, and there was a need to run the engine without the cam sync temporarily, would be the best alternative be multi point, 360*, and halve the master fuel (hoping deadtime are accurate)? Edited March 5, 2017 by CamB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Posted March 6, 2017 Report Share Posted March 6, 2017 You should be able to just select multi point group and should not need much else maybe a slight fuel trim. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OGtrent Posted June 23, 2017 Report Share Posted June 23, 2017 I would set it to sequential and wire for a semi-sequential operation: In real life there is usually very little noticeable difference in how an engine will run when comparing semi-sequential to multi-point group mode, but with semi-seq you may be able to achieve a slightly smoother idle and very light load operation.In 360 mode your injector has to fire twice as often so pulse widths are halved and you have twice the dead time per cycle, this becomes an issue mostly only with very large injectors but I still suggest always use 720 mode if you have capable triggeringhey guys new to the forum i'am currently wiring in a G4 storm in to my ER34 rb25det neo the ecu had previously been wired for a rb25det s2 not knowing how they previous owners had wired the car im guessing its how you have mentioned in this thread as semi sequential injection i just want to be sure that a G4 storm is compatible to run semi-sequential injection and whats the best way to wire it up cheers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adamw Posted June 23, 2017 Report Share Posted June 23, 2017 Yes this would be the way to do it if you are starting from scratch. If it is already wired for batch fire then you will probably find it will run perfectly fine like that to. Semi seq you might be able to get slightly smoother idle and sometimes a little smoother run at light loads. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dc123 Posted November 26, 2019 Report Share Posted November 26, 2019 old thread but im wring an atom ecu onto a 2.9 boa v6 ford engine with firing order of 1-4-2-5-3-6 so cylinder 1 1 & 6 cylinder 2 4 & 3 cylinder 3 5 & 2 not 100% sure on this Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Posted November 26, 2019 Report Share Posted November 26, 2019 Assuming you have a cam sync and can run semi sequential then Drive 1 to 1-4 Drive 2 to 2-5 Drive 3 to 3-6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dc123 Posted November 27, 2019 Report Share Posted November 27, 2019 on this engine there is no cam pick up although i can design one easily enough, out of interest can you still run this engine without a cam sync? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leiden Posted November 28, 2019 Report Share Posted November 28, 2019 Without a Cam Sync you can run it with Wasted Spark Ignition and Batch Injection or you can run it as a '3 Cylinder 2 Stroke Sequential' with Injectors and Ignition outputs paired for cylinders that are at TDC together (360 degrees apart in the firing order). I used to run my engine that way but had trouble getting the idle mixtures lean enough since the Injectors are firing twice per '720degree' cycle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dc123 Posted November 28, 2019 Report Share Posted November 28, 2019 ok thanks, so when using batch fire do i still wire it like semi-sequential from the previous post ? batch fire does not show up on mine but i am guessing multi-point group is the same thing? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Posted November 28, 2019 Report Share Posted November 28, 2019 Batch = Multi point group. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dc123 Posted November 28, 2019 Report Share Posted November 28, 2019 On 11/26/2019 at 8:07 PM, Simon said: Assuming you have a cam sync and can run semi sequential then Drive 1 to 1-4 Drive 2 to 2-5 Drive 3 to 3-6 thanks simon and wire it the same as what you said before? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adamw Posted November 29, 2019 Report Share Posted November 29, 2019 8 hours ago, dc123 said: thanks simon and wire it the same as what you said before? With multi-point group the wiring is really no longer relevent as the injection event is no longer timed to the intake valve event, so you can pair them up in 3 groups of 2 or 2 groups of 3, will work fine either way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leiden Posted December 3, 2019 Report Share Posted December 3, 2019 If you are grouping injectors make sure the total current on each output channel does not exceed 5A. If you have 3 injectors on a single output channel the injector winding resistance should be at least 9ohms. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.