Slim47 Posted January 12 Report Share Posted January 12 Hello I have pre-turbo individual LSU 4.9 installed that are connected as +5V sensors. Does anyone have knowledge of the Target AFR adjustment table for EMAP? Perhaps someone has already set up LSU 4.9 and has experience in this. I see something similar in the first approximation: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vaughan Posted January 12 Report Share Posted January 12 Are you using Link CAN Lambdas or a different Lambda controller? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slim47 Posted January 13 Author Report Share Posted January 13 13 hours ago, Vaughan said: Are you using Link CAN Lambdas or a different Lambda controller? I am using different lambdas (AEM UEGO). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adamw Posted January 13 Report Share Posted January 13 You cant do press compensation on the already computed lambda value, the compensation needs to be applied to the measured pump current before that is converted to lambda in the controller as neither the compensation or Ip/lambda relationship are linear or proportional. You will need a wideband controller that can do the compensation internally. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peace Posted January 13 Report Share Posted January 13 20 minutes ago, Adamw said: You cant do press compensation on the already computed lambda value, the compensation needs to be applied to the measured pump current before that is converted to lambda in the controller as neither the compensation or Ip/lambda relationship are linear or proportional. You will need a wideband controller that can do the compensation internally. Adam Can you advice controller which can do this job? There were AEMone, but i believe it is discontinued now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slim47 Posted January 13 Author Report Share Posted January 13 1 hour ago, Adamw said: You cant do press compensation on the already computed lambda value, the compensation needs to be applied to the measured pump current before that is converted to lambda in the controller as neither the compensation or Ip/lambda relationship are linear or proportional. You will need a wideband controller that can do the compensation internally. Why can't I apply an adjustment to an already calculated value? Bosch, as I indicated above, shows the dependence of the adjustment on the Back pressure. Maybe I don't understand something ( From the Bosch data sheet, we see that at 120 kPa of overpressure in the exhaust manifold there is a 40% error. That is, if the target lambda is 0.78, then this results in 0.088 ((1.00-0.78) * 0.4) errors, that is, we must target 0.69 (0.78-0.088) to get the true lambda at 0.78 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adamw Posted January 14 Report Share Posted January 14 The Y axis of the pressure compensation table is not lambda, it is the % change in measured current that was required to drive the ion pump, often designated "pump current" or "Ip". Ip is related to lambda, but not directly. You need both the sensor temperature and the Ip passed through a lookup table to derive Lambda. The relationship of temperature and Ip to lambda is not linear or even close to linear - a 5% change in Ip is not a 5% change in lambda. FYI that datasheet you have is also for an ADV sensor, not the 4.9. The 4.9 is actually much less sensitive to pressure, it has a max Ip difference of about 15% at 2.5Bar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0x33 Posted January 14 Report Share Posted January 14 The real question is, when is Link going to release a multi channel (6 or 8) lambda controller. Daisy chaining 7 CAN Lambdas to do the job looks messy as, would be nice to have everything contained in one unit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rozsko Posted January 14 Report Share Posted January 14 But evennif you don't do compensation, the point of pre turbo individual widebands is to balance out the cylinders. No? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slim47 Posted January 15 Author Report Share Posted January 15 15 hours ago, Rozsko said: But evennif you don't do compensation, the point of pre turbo individual widebands is to balance out the cylinders. No? In addition to the fact that the cylinders need to be balanced, you need to know the true value so as not to burn the engine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slim47 Posted January 15 Author Report Share Posted January 15 23 hours ago, Adamw said: The Y axis of the pressure compensation table is not lambda, it is the % change in measured current that was required to drive the ion pump, often designated "pump current" or "Ip". Ip is related to lambda, but not directly. You need both the sensor temperature and the Ip passed through a lookup table to derive Lambda. The relationship of temperature and Ip to lambda is not linear or even close to linear - a 5% change in Ip is not a 5% change in lambda. FYI that datasheet you have is also for an ADV sensor, not the 4.9. The 4.9 is actually much less sensitive to pressure, it has a max Ip difference of about 15% at 2.5Bar. Complete answer as always. I am grateful to you. You make a huge contribution to our education ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mapper Posted January 15 Report Share Posted January 15 Usally I just use one lambda after the turbo for overall adjustment to target lambda. The individual before read richer, however it doesn't matter, you just need to balance them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slim47 Posted January 15 Author Report Share Posted January 15 4 hours ago, mapper said: Usally I just use one lambda after the turbo for overall adjustment to target lambda. The individual before read richer, however it doesn't matter, you just need to balance them. Yes, this approach works. But it reminds me of a crutch when you add another lambda being unable to correctly set up the 6 available )) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.