iecku.tavea racing Posted November 26, 2016 Report Share Posted November 26, 2016 HeyIs it possible to add some custom boost trim tables? I would do the trim with EGT and SLIP%Regards Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Posted November 28, 2016 Report Share Posted November 28, 2016 I can ask the engineers to consider this.Scott iecku.tavea racing 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mapper Posted November 28, 2016 Report Share Posted November 28, 2016 As i already suggested. Adding 4D/5D tables to boost, traction and maybe other functions would be a great way to do that :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iecku.tavea racing Posted February 20, 2017 Author Report Share Posted February 20, 2017 any news on this? :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Llewellyn Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 +1 for this - 4D / 5D to boost Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 +1 too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adamw Posted February 22, 2017 Report Share Posted February 22, 2017 I have put another +2 on the request list for this feature to give it some more weight. It will get done, just no promises when yet. Ducie54 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CamB Posted February 23, 2017 Report Share Posted February 23, 2017 If I am not already a "+1" for this in another thread you should also consider me another interested person. Interested in 4D and overlay. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adamw Posted February 23, 2017 Report Share Posted February 23, 2017 If I am not already a "+1" for this in another thread you should also consider me another interested person. Interested in 4D and overlay.Hi CamB, we have this feature request all lumped together with your 4D/5D/overlay traction control request since they will be similar to implement. So yes your +1 is already counted... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CamB Posted February 23, 2017 Report Share Posted February 23, 2017 Thanks - I thought it might be. Good work Team Link. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mapper Posted May 30, 2017 Report Share Posted May 30, 2017 (edited) Just checked some more loggs from a hill climb car I tuned last year. We really need additional boost tables. Car makes too less boost on higher altitudes (lower BAP). Wastegate table is spanned target boost vs rpm, means I need another table to increase feed forwarding base wg duty cycle. The closed loop boost system can't act fast enough.Hope 4D/5D strateggy is implemented with next update. Edited May 30, 2017 by mapper Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adamw Posted May 30, 2017 Report Share Posted May 30, 2017 I agree it would be nice but I think boost control is unlikely to see any further improvements in the G4+Depending on how many tables you are using now there may be other workarounds. You could set up 2 boost tables in "interpolate between" mode. One will be the high altitude table and the other the low altitude table, you then have a blend table that you could span with BAP.Another option would be to have 3 DC tables set up for high/med/low altitude and use a virtual aux to switch between them. The virtual aux could reference BAP or EMAP or some other relevant parameter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Llewellyn Posted May 30, 2017 Report Share Posted May 30, 2017 It is this kind of this which is REALLY frustrating. "Unlikely to see any future improvements in the G4+ platform"The G4+ Thunder I have is barely 18 months old and you guys are already moving on? I have been bug fixing for my entire ownership and feel this is a complete jip.I would like a serious and honest comment on this as if this is the case mine is being sold and I will move to another platform that has some life expectancy. Ducie54 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adamw Posted May 30, 2017 Report Share Posted May 30, 2017 If you read my comment again and keep it in context you will note I said "Boost control is unlikely to see any future improvements in the G4+ platform". We are still working on many improvements and bug fixes etc in the G4+ but from what I understand to make any significant improvement to the present boost control strategy it will need a total re-write which was deemed not viable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ducie54 Posted May 30, 2017 Report Share Posted May 30, 2017 Andre from HPA informed LINK with this problem awhile go going by his comments in the LINK closed loop boost control webinar and course. Llewellyn HPA go through a work around for the issue. https://www.hpacademy.com/forum/boost-control/show/link-g4-closed-loop-boost-control Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Posted May 30, 2017 Report Share Posted May 30, 2017 Hi LlewellynDevelopment will continue on the G4+ for some time to come. But to keep improving in an electronic environment there will always be a point at which the platform has to be updated.The G4+ range is coming up on 4 years old now and I expect us to continue with it for some time to come (years not months)So don't panic the support is still there. mapper 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikegt4dude Posted September 5, 2017 Report Share Posted September 5, 2017 +1 on this Hi, I'm finding that using a Rotary switch to have multiple boost targets hampers my creativity on the tables as inherently 2 out of 4 axis go byebye and Engine speed is kinda necessary so that makes it just 1 axis free to play with, and when you have flex fuel that rules out using the 2nd set of mapsThe thing I had in mind is that using a Compressor speed sensor to control conditions like surge or transient response should really use a WGDC modification as a first port of call before a GP limiter Also related, Why can't you select Turbo RPM on DI channels 11-16 with the higher 6.5kHz like the manual suggests but the software dropdown box does not? Cheers Mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hellafabrication Posted October 19, 2017 Report Share Posted October 19, 2017 On 2017-09-05 at 9:14 AM, mikegt4dude said: +1 on this Hi, I'm finding that using a Rotary switch to have multiple boost targets hampers my creativity on the tables as inherently 2 out of 4 axis go byebye and Engine speed is kinda necessary so that makes it just 1 axis free to play with, and when you have flex fuel that rules out using the 2nd set of maps The thing I had in mind is that using a Compressor speed sensor to control conditions like surge or transient response should really use a WGDC modification as a first port of call before a GP limiter Also related, Why can't you select Turbo RPM on DI channels 11-16 with the higher 6.5kHz like the manual suggests but the software dropdown box does not? Cheers Mike +1 on this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iecku.tavea racing Posted December 23, 2017 Author Report Share Posted December 23, 2017 Hey Any news in this or a helpful workaround? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.